Monday 18 September 2017

Review: Ken Follett's "Column of Fire"


Few novels have so totally and utterly gripped and consumed me as Pillars of the Earth has. Only few novels I return to read and re-read again, and Pillars is one of those I consistently and passionately recommend to pretty much readers of any genre because the storytelling, tension, characters and atmosphere are universally beyond compare. Pillars converted me to historical fiction, Pillars is one of the few books that gives me an itch to write myself. There is a reason this book has a cult following, we weren’t kidding, y’all. In my nigh 12 years as a bookseller, I have made countless people sit down to just read the first page, most of whom would quickly become so absorbed they would be rendered unresponsive to hell fires and high waters. I have never had a customer come back to me and tell me they hated it. In fact, many told me they consequently became Folletteers. (That’s a term now. I retain all rights and royalties. But when the Kool-Aid comes out, I had nothing to do with it, just saying…)

Now there’s a build-up! But then, it’s preaching to the choir, because I assume most people reading this review have been gagging for this sequel anyway. I myself have been hyperventilating since I saw Follett’s Instagram pictures of doing research into Elizabethan England and put two and two together many moons ago.

But there’s the dilemma. With the massive gaps between the three books (Pillars was released in 1989), each of them had plenty of time to work themselves up onto an unrivalled Olympian pedestal, putting more pressure onto the follow-up. I love World without End, but had to read it a couple of times to succumb to Pillars Polygamy.  And the key was to accept WWE as a book in its own right, not one attempting to be its literary mother. (Parenting analogies, see! We’ve come to that. There goes Larkin’s “your children are not your children”.)

The same goes for A Column of Fire. Face it. It is not Pillars of the Earth. It’s set over 400 years later, so it couldn’t be. All the original characters are long dead, though I was glad to see Prior Philip got a decent tomb out of it, even though it gets abused as a hiding place for Elizabethan teenage canoodling. But the red-haired Jack Jackson gene is still going strong. The female leads are still feisty. Kingsbridge Cathedral is still standing in all its glory, even though the Puritans have some beef with its riches and idolatry and might have clobbered some saint statues (how dare you touch Jack’s fine handiwork!). The monastery is falling apart though, thanks a lot, King Henry VIII.
Kingsbridge has expanded, but is still torn by polarised families and its usual villains and heroes, that being exacerbated by the outright war between Catholics and Protestants, which thwarts, in true Follettesque Romeo & Juliet fashion, the romantic relationship between protagonists Ned Willard and Margery Fitzgerald. But the cathedral is no longer a focal point in the story, and Kingsbridge, despite being a returning setting, is no longer the centre of the story. A large part is set in France and the bitter, murderous feuds between Catholics and Huguenots, and the focus is on Elizabeth I and her network of spies trying to stay in power while Catholics scheme left, right and centre to get rid of her; Mary Stuart lingers in various prisons trying to communicate with the outside world, and generally everyone is constantly under threat of being either a heretic or a traitor, depending on where the fickle winds of power blow.

Kingsbridge characters play key roles in this epic battle, and oh do they play them well. The heroes are as deliciously human, flawed and tormented as the villains are delightfully Waleran/Lady Reganesque, with their trademark sadistic psychopathy. A group of characters you’ll grow to love embody the larger conflicts they inhabit in cinematic storytelling, bringing this turmoiled era home to you like a missile. It’s a cracking historical epic which you will just devour (it took me less than two weeks) and thoroughly enjoy once you manage to let go of the idea that this is not attempting to be a rehash of Pillars. And you’ll probably grow to love it even more once you re-read it.
Follett truly has outdone himself once again.  I bow to thee, master.

With Elizabethan curtsies,

Patty